The death of on-line voting

On-line voting in Local Elections may well be scrapped

Government in this country can give one the right hump!. The latest piece of policy concerns E-government and E-voting. Why is this such an issue? Well in the last election turnout was somewhat low not only in the general election but in the more recent local elections. And what is our government going to do about it, stop E-voting.

The Electoral Commission has published a review (2nd August 2007) criticising the e-counting and e-voting pilots at the 2007 local elections. Commission chief executive Peter Wardle said: "We have learnt a good deal from pilots over the past few years. But we do not see any merit in continuing with small-scale, piecemeal piloting where similar innovations are explored each year without sufficient planning and implementation time, and in the absence of any clear direction, or likelihood of new insights. 

 

Small scale ?  – This from 2003 - The Local Government Finance (England) Special Grant Report (No. 121) on Invest to Save Budget Round 5 Projects, Local E-Government Programme and E-Voting report provides 18 local authorities with about £18.3 million of funding to support the enhanced programme of e-voting pilots that took place during this May's local elections.

In total, 59 local authorities, covering more than 6.4 million voters, held electoral pilot schemes; making it the biggest ever test of national e-voting technology. E-voting pilots included digital television, internet, touch-tone telephone, text messaging and, in the counting of votes, e-counting machines and all-postal ballots. If this is small scale I’d hate to think what might happen and what it would cost if they did it on a grand scale!

 

The schemes were aimed at modernising and reinvigorating the electoral process, making it easier for people to vote. As the programme develops, they say “we wish to see widespread e-enabled elections to local authorities and the devolved administrations. The ultimate objective is to hold an e-enabled general election at some time after 2006.”

 

Local Government Online set aside £10 million in each year (2002 to 2005) for e-voting. In 2004, the North West E-Government Group (Just one of 8 Regions) allocated £1m to support for e-voting quality assurance alongside the £12m allocation for 2005 e-voting pilots. So having spent £58.3m and involved 6.4 million people in a “small scale” operation the Electoral Commission is proposing scrapping E-voting. This is much to the disgust of Swindon. Deputy returning officer Alan Winchcombe said that while it may have failed elsewhere, it worked in Swindon. "Everybody does things on the internet or by telephone these days and if we don't bring the voting process into the modern age, the younger population in Swindon won't bother to vote," he said. "That's what they're telling us, they won't go to one polling station on one day to do it, they need to have some choice and flexibility. "We had some people voting at 3 or 4 o'clock in the morning because it suited their lifestyle."

 

Come on guys get into the 21st century, if you want people to be involved in local and central politics and cast their votes make it easy for them to do so. Standing around polling station on a cold night, possibly raining is not the ticket. In this day and age where everything can be performed for home from shopping to watching a movie surly casting a vote, which after all is only putting a cross on a piece of paper, should be done on-line and goodness only knows when we can all do it maybe the bill for elections will be radically reduced.

 

Comments

# BLewis2 said:

On-line votong scrapped!? This is the best way that people can get together and share opinions.

Being "on-line" is one way of haveing freedom of speech... looks like our government dosn't like us to have one.

07 November 2007 10:58
# plilley2 said:

Hey Keith,

I've read all the history of eVoting you've put in this piece - interesting stuff. But the bit I'm interested in is "why the Government is suggesting that eVoting is stopped". They're supposed to be intelligent people (err.... try and go with the flow on this one), so why would they want fewer people to vote?  Couldn't be that they think eVoters are less likely to be Labour voters could it? What do you think? Cos if that's the case, you'd expect the "call me Dave's" party to get on the case.

07 November 2007 11:02
# kcooper said:

Hi Peter,

You could be right of course it may well be to do with voting pattens and the government ensuring only the voting pattens they like are replicated.

As for Dave's blue army, they miss so many tricks regarding political point scoring it would be a miracle if they managed to pick up on this one. Look how they have completely managed to miss the opportunity over regional assemblies!!!! After all it was dear old Prescott who screwed that one up and the blues let it go.

The real problem is most likely to be that they have not thought the processes through properly. After all people voting at 4 in the morning is going to give them a problem.

Keith

07 November 2007 11:16
# ECox1 said:

I am always online and find it much easier to vote from my computer rather than have to go out of my way to vote

07 November 2007 11:54